I like alot of things, and seem to have defined myself by a certain few of those likes, and loves etc. I dont want to be that british graduate pentecostal anglican wannabe guy that is always saying stuff like "interesting" and correcting grammar and singing rule britannia and god save the queen in latin while dancing around st. georges cross. To tell you the truth, though, Im not that smart. and Ive never been to England
and sometimes I forget how to spell business.

So, two posts back I posted a picture of an old Scroll (the tan one), but! I did so without a translation (it's only really a few words). So! I figured I'd add one, just cause Im a nerd and that's what I do.

[ According to Mark]

The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ [the son of God] just as it is written in Isaiah the prophet [...]

That's it, simple enough I suppose.

Later

Justin

I made up a joke!
No really..


What did the greek canadian say to the guy who had just had his eyes poked out?

...
Toughloss ei?

HA!
Justin

Me or him? That is my question.


I spent way too many hours trying to circle and connect text in the first chapter of Mark to give some cohesiveness to a few ideas in the Gospel of Mark. I tried it in word. I tried it in publisher. I tried it in paint. I failed miserably. It was the font's fault. Eventually I gave up and decided that it might be wholesome to print it off and mark it up with a pen and ink; sort of a higher text re-visitation of the scribes etc. who went before me and whose job has made mine both enjoyable and difficult.

In that Spirit, I decided to revisit the work of my forerunners, and maybe evaluate their work a little. Criticism never hurt anyone. Besides, I'd been doing some textual work on the first chapter of Mark, and my notes mentioned something about an original revision to the text of Mark 1:1 on Codex Sinaiticus.. the big one. Not that Mark changed his mind, but that one of the scribes copying from some older manuscript, that we don't have, onto what we now know as Sinaiticus made a mistake, an omission even, and instead of ripping up the whole page and starting again, like we've all been told they used to do, he just added his omission on top in little scribbly letters; like we do. Well, the lazier among us anyway (guilty as charged). So I've included the opening lines of Mark 1:1, the same text that is shown above, except above I have muddled a word processed critical text (that includes far more influence than just Sinaiticus) and below I've shown n 1800 year old version of the same thing (Sinaiticus, I think I've mentioned that, right?), no doubt produced by some second century graduate student trying to make his way through Mark.
So, I repeat my question, which one is better? It's all up to you now folks, and remember, Jesus is watching, and the guy who wrote the old one is too dead to have his feelings hurt.

I like food.
I am a food snob.
I posted a picture of eggs benedict on my websight.
Recently I was in Nova Scotia (Most of you have met Britter on Myspace:))
Her mom was a fantastic cook. We had fresh seafood a couple of times and it was sooo simple, et Im not sure I could do it myself.
BUT!
In my desperation, I turned to simple food.
On the train on the way home we had a baguette broken with turkey brie and basil.
Thats it
Just bread with a hunk of turkey, a squish of brie and a few leaves of basil.
it was delicious..
So we explored more..
Goat cheese on digestive cookies (sans chocolat) covered in either cranberries and cinnamon, or the "herb blend" which turned out to be mostly basil (mmmmm my fav).
I dont have a picture right now, but Im sure you can imagine, anf frankly Im not sure how many people would want to look at a pcture of a sandwich or crackers and cheese.
On a side note, that train ride led to Belleville, whch was heavenly, and eventually to Pearson International Airport... which was slightly less wonderful.
Fortunately, however, in 31 days it will become a better place.
Till then
Justin